Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by Gigachad 1478 days ago
The bridges are not horrible. But they aren’t super reliable. I have seen them go down for a few days once, generally be a bit slow, forward messages out of order, etc.

The free matrix.org server is also overloaded. The paid server is much faster.
1 comments
zaik 1478 days ago
Still, bridges do not really solve fragmentation problems the same way compliance with internet standards does.

For example bridges break important features like end-to-end encryption.

link
Gigachad 1478 days ago
Internet standards have consistently failed to innovate. Email and IRC have failed to progress along with proprietary platforms. Features like end to end encryption require user effort and plugins which never took off.

Having 5 IM apps installed is much preferable to me than 1 worse app. Not sure the situation for XMPP but I have been told its highly fragmented with extensions that not all clients support. If I'm talking with someone, I want a high level of assurance that their client is pretty much the same as mine and that all features work and look roughly the same on both sides.

link
zaik 1478 days ago
> Internet standards have consistently failed to innovate.

Internet standards do not innovate. People that adopt standards and built interesting things with them do.

For example, Google originally wrote the Jingle XMPP extension. Sadly, it seems like there are no real economic incentives for interoperabilty in the IM space (quite the opposite if you already have a lot of users on your platform), so we don't see a lot of investment going into the adoption of internet standards from big players anymore.

link