Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by dwaite 1477 days ago
Typically MFA is something you have (physical possession), along with something you know (secret) or something you are (biometric).

This is more abstract than physical possession of a single device with a non-exfiltratable private key. There are synchronization processes (so its one of many physical devices, on a sync fabric which allows devices to be added).

The process for adding a device should require multiple factors as well, but I believe there ultimately is a typically a recovery mechanism like a printed recovery key which would make this considered single-factor.

However, most deployed 2FA is via SMS, email, or backed-up TOTP today. The goal is to build a much more secure system that is recoverable enough to get consumer adoption, not to try to achieve say NIST 800-63 AAL3.

One ongoing proposal is that you get an additional device-bound factor as well. Seeing a new device-bound factor would let you decide to do additional user verification checks if desired.