[Matthias247]

Note that even the previous draft specification (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-quic-http/34/) was a mapping of HTTP semantics on top of QUIC. It didn't carry too many transport specific concerns - which e.g. HTTP/2 did, since it cared about flow control and other things.

I have yet to read RFC 9114, but I guess it's refinded to fit better on top of the new HTTP semantics spec (RFC 9110).

[rektide]

I'd be aghast to see a significant rewrite of a specification as it moves from draft to rfc. The draft, at it's end, should closely mirror the final spec.