[kappuchino]

Well, this is a substitute for a person driven taxi. "Not being able to get a taxi" is a confusing reply, since this assumption is wrong. My question begore relates to what you think are the disadvantages, since you asked "Why is this better than a normal taxi?". I beliebe its the same, just no driver from the consumers point of view, is it not?

[Gordonjcp]

Okay, well, the disadvantage is it is not driven by a person, so it is less safe, and less flexible.

What would be any of the advantages of it?

[kappuchino]

Less safe is up to the statistics. My guess is that its safe "enough" right now and only gets safer beyond humans. But the other point is more interesting: Flexibility. Since you don't need a driver, you can have a different kind of fleet management that - yes, I am an optimist - would be more available 24/7 than with human drivers.

[Gordonjcp]

See that's the thing, I don't see how it can ever be safer than all but the least competent human drivers.

I have yet to see an autonomous vehicle that could cope with anything other than a completely unobstructed road with everyone behaving themselves, and I can't see a way for autonomous vehicles to progress beyond that.

If you don't think taxis are available 24/7, you haven't met anyone that drives a taxi. Someone is always up and about.