Why dont they go public? after the nvidia fell through i cant imagine qualcomm acquiring them.
It seems like ARM is in a really strong position for the next decade or two. Would be an instant BUY rating by most brokers IMO.
Please no. Publicly trading companies creates one of the worst incentives for poor long-term business decisions. ARM is the kind of company that we can't as a society afford to become short-term profit oriented.
>It seems like ARM is in a really strong position for the next decade or two.
What? They just had a massive layoff which culled 15% of their staff?
In this climate, no way in hell they would be rated as an instant buy.
Their revenue growth and revenues in general are tiny what $2.8 billion, and mostly restricted to licensing/royalties.
They were gonna be bought by nvidia for what 40-60 billion dollars?
They are also competing in the space with massive players a la Nvidia, AMD, Intel who are looking to eat their lunch.
The landscape is shifting by adopting the Big Little structure, adding more core counts, and a much bigger prioritization towards dedicated accelerator offload cards. Not to mention an increase in prioritization to RISC V.
Not sure why you're being downvoted for asking a reasonable question but yes, I do think going public would probably be a bad end and shift focus toward immediate returns for shareholders.
For the most part, RISC-V is being crammed into SOCs for low-end functionality where you'd have to pay ARM a license fee. There's a massive technical alliance with thousands of members and many such SOCs being made.
Wins in SOCs are things like Google's Titan M2 in Pixel 6, or inside various Seagate storage ASICs-- or NVIDIA's stated intent to replace the Falcon controller CPU in all of their products with RISC-V.
Yes, it's just a few percent of the embedded processor market, and all the current microcontroller use is very low end right now.