|
> But let's also add, that so many of them will gladly believe
everything an ad financed company tells them, just to have a bit of
convenience and just so that they do not have to go against any
network effect. All that, while people tell them, that they are
being spied on. All that, while there is one personal data scandal
after the other. You are so right, I can't argue against that. It's the same psychology
and social dynamics as why people continue to smoke or use harmful
street drugs while seeing the people around them dying or getting
sick, and being told every day that it's harmful. I tried to make as clear, and sensitively as I could in Digital Vegan
[1] why I think some digital technologies are a major public health
issue, and that we are in the same territory as with tobacco 50 years
ago. One problem is that unlike heroin and tobacco, where the sickness of
the victims is a net burden on governments, consumer capitalism, being
a form of proxy mass-surveillance, traps governments in an uneasy "see
no evil" alliance, if not outright support for digital harms. Another is that digital harms can be remote, deferred in time and
place, thus difficult to connect causally. As with many diseases or
pollutants we are still in the early stages of understanding the
effects of damage to privacy. [1] https://digitalvegan.net |