| Drift velocity has everything to do with the discussion, which is why you brought it up. I’m familiar with Pauli exclusion principle I’ve worked on real semiconductors. Your last point is wrong, everything else you said is correct but it remains irrelevant since it does not contradict what was said. Both links are correct. As you know the net fermi velocity of a fermion is 0. The directional velocity resulting from an electric field on an electron, the fermi velocity which becomes directional due to net flow, is the drift velocity. Which is what we care about. You can do a simple experiment with NMR to measure the speed of electrons. Indeed they’ve done it and it corresponds to the “wrong calculations”.[1] Edit: Good resource [2] to help you understand the difference between those two velocities: > However, the drift velocity of electrons in metals - the speed at which electrons move in applied electric field - is quite slow, on the order of 0.0001 m/s, or .01 cm/s. You can easily outrun an electron drifting in a metal, even if you have been drinking all night and have been personally reduced to a very slow crawl. > To summarize, electrons are traveling in metals at the Fermi velocity vF, which is very, very fast (106 m/s), but the flux of electrons is the same in all directions. That is, they are going nowhere fast. In an electric field, a very small but directional drift velocity is superimposed on this fast random motion of valence electrons. [1] https://physics.aps.org/story/v17/st4 [2] https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Inorganic_Chemistry/... |
> Your last point is wrong
> To summarize, electrons are traveling in metals at the Fermi velocity vF
your own quote. come on. I have a phd in this shit.