Explain why what I said is ridiculous, or I'll discard your comment as nonsense.
If we don't have a technical solution for a problem (which we don't in this case), then regulation is appropriate. If and when we find a technical solution for this problem, then the legislation will be deprecated. Until that point, it is useful.
What is "ridiculous", is assuming that all problems have technical solutions.
If we don't have a technical solution for a problem (which we don't in this case), then regulation is appropriate. If and when we find a technical solution for this problem, then the legislation will be deprecated. Until that point, it is useful.
What is "ridiculous", is assuming that all problems have technical solutions.