That Twitter thread made me MORE of a believer that Dall-E has a language its own. As others said, seems like the argument is more about defining "language".
it's not about defining language, it's about refuting the original claim, which was that piping these symbols _back in_ could trigger similar semantic categories - which it clearly can't.
A bunch of people didn't read the original study and just saw the pictures and assumed the gibberish is the only result being discussed.
A bunch of people didn't read the original study and just saw the pictures and assumed the gibberish is the only result being discussed.