Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by rektide 1485 days ago
A vast part of problem is that the people deciding aren't adequately technical, can't judge the non-obvious clause adequately.

Making up some faint new claim, that so happens to largely encompasses the existing claim, feels all too regular. There's just so few people fit to judge, to appropriately decide to award or not award another decade or so of monopoly to a patent.