Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by OJFord 1480 days ago
But they ('re automated system or through mistake or whatever) thought they did have evidence of fraud right, so that's consistent?
1 comments

Perhaps I wasn't clear.. I mean that they sent some vague email saying it they'd detected fraud, and took other 'we've found fraud' actions (it was a false positive yes, but beside my point) - so it would be weird if they then acted like they couldn't take registrar actions that they could only take if the reason was fraud.

The behaviour was wrong and concerning yes, but it seems internally consistent, all along the 'fraud' path.