Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by GekkePrutser 1478 days ago
Mbelib is of questionable legality as it implements a codec patented by DVSI. Indeed you might trigger some vulnerability at a hobbyist but a professional would never use it.

And public safety channels here are all encrypted so there's nothing to listen to, perhaps in the US that's not the case.

1 comments

There's a long history of open source software implementing patented algorithms, especially in the video and audio codec space. Those open source implementations are definitely used by professionals, so I would recommend not being so assured about the scope of use of software that may contain patented algorithms.

The vocal data on public safety channels being reported as encrypted does not necessarily say that there could be no vulnerability there. There's lots of control data that may or may not be encrypted, and encryption does not prevent all kinds of attacks here.

No I was just talking about the codec of course.

But nobody sells radio sets based on mbelib except the Chinese budget brands (e.g. baofeng) which have circumvented DVSI's patent by setting up a local company that sells the patent because they say they own it (even though they have no right to do it, but DVSI can't sue them in China). But all the public safety ones I've seen are brands like motorola and hytera that buy the real DVSI codecs.

But I'm not saying there are no other vulnerabilities. I'm just saying that there will not be many people using mbelib to listen to public safety frequencies because there is nothing to listen to as it's encrypted.