[sammorrowdrums]

I frequently reference Louis CK bit. It is so frequently applicable.

That said, I think it’s also a compliment to a tool when it does such a good job, that people criticise it for not doing a perfect job. The fact it’s actually doing the job at all is pretty wonderful. I thoroughly enjoyed seeing the results.

[meheleventyone]

It depends a lot on what you think a good job actually looks like. This sort of prompt based regurgitation and remixing of data sets is super cool from a technical perspective and will maybe be useful one day but from someone mildly interested in this being an actual tool it needs to bridge that last 10%. That doesn't mean it has to be perfect at all. Which seems like a general summation of a lot of ML.