|
|
|
|
|
|
by jah242
1484 days ago
|
|
|
Just in case you are asking in good faith. If you look at the same data release, the excess deaths are almost entirely in cancer and dementia in old people (with the exception of a spike in diabetes at the same time as the spike in COVID infections likely due to it being a significant comorbidity). So whilst I m sure the higher excess deaths in Australia is difficult to explain (as there is probably a multitude of factors). The theory that somehow the vaccines give people dementia or cancer (which have not been associated with COVID or the vaccine) AND these usually relatively long term diseases go on to kill them within a 2-4 month period AND this only happens to old people for some reason AND other countries have not observed a similar pattern despite the vast number of vaccines given, seems highly unlikely. In addition, assuming the author is referring to the UK ONS, our public health body does release excess mortality estimates on a weekly basis - and unsurprisingly they correlate with the waves of COVID infections, not the vaccination program. https://app.powerbi.com/view?r=eyJrIjoiYmUwNmFhMjYtNGZhYS00N... |
|
|
An increase in dementia and cancer is exactly what contrarian scientists and researchers fear as potential long-term side-effects of breakdown of spike protein in the body (amyloid plaque deposits), and dysregulation of the immune system due to mRNA treatments (host immune system not fully-functioning results in ineffective disease suppression across the board).
An emerging thesis explaining diverse pathology in post-covid / post-vax (let us call it post-spike exposure) is that breakdown of spike protein results in beta-amyloid plaque deposits in the body, which leads to Alzheimers, systemic amyloidosis, fibrogenesis.
Other mainstream research is now also converging on this idea. [1]
One of the original researchers who appears early on this discussed it in the last few days with one of the DRASTIC researchers Jay Couey: "Amyloidogenesis of the Spike Protein" [2]
Jay has an interesting 10 minute monologue just prior to the interview which is also worth viewing. [3] He summarises the industry dogma (and why it's flawed) in a succint way: "Seroprevalence to an epitope is taken as a correlate of immunity to a pathogen on which that epitope is found. And if this mechanism is part of immunity, it is a small fraction of the total immune response..."
In terms of UK all-cause mortality data, Fenton's analysis has been very interesting. Also interesting to see him suddenly cast out of respectable society once he decided something was very off with the statistical analysis going on. [4]
[1]: https://medicalxpress.com/news/2022-05-discovery-mechanism-m...
[2] https://www.twitch.tv/videos/1310649065?t=0h34m9s
[3] https://www.twitch.tv/videos/1310649065?t=0h23m58s
[4] http://www.eecs.qmul.ac.uk/~norman/papers/inconsistencies_va...