|
|
|
|
|
by thenoblesunfish
1478 days ago
|
|
Anyone less familiar with the field should be aware that it’s widely known that the benchmark used for this list (multiplying two huge dense matrices) is not representative of many real use cases in scientific computing. So while it’s fun to push this one number higher, one has to ask if it’s really worth the incredible amount of money involved, when it’s something of a drag race. |
|
Among other scientific purposes of course. But the 'quiet part' is that a lot of this comes down to simulated nukes. (Much like how the space program was really a nuke delivery project)
These computers remain useful for other physics simulations of course: atom to atom interactions, protein folding, weather modeling. So they also serve the scientific community.