[sampo]

That is correct. But we were talking about how the == operator compares zeros. According to IEEE 754, -0 == +0 even though their bit patterns are not identical. And, by the way, inf != inf even if their bit patterns are identical.

[MauranKilom]

> But we were talking about how the == operator compares zeros

Well, you were and I wasn't, and it wasn't clear whether you meant to contradict my point. I guess I could've made it more clear that I meant "using == to denote bitwise equality here only" and not "btw, == is bitwise for floats", but either way it should be clear now.

[andreareina]

You mean nan right?

[sampo]

Yes. I mean nan != nan. I don’t know why I wrote inf. Thank you for correcting.