[rg111]

I think that the fact that there are special types of learners have been debunked thoroughly.

Veritasium recently made a video, too [0].

3b1b is a fantastic supplementary resource. But you can't start with it, or use it as your primary resource. That would be a mistake.

[0]: https://youtube.com/watch?v=rhgwIhB58PA

[ars]

That video is not convincing, at least for me, wrong style learning is more tiring. I can read a book about a subject all day, but I can only listen to about an hour of lecture a day.

I'll absorb the same amount - during that first hour, but after that nothing further is getting in my head.

Also the computerized thing about a diagram vs words isn't a learning style difference - both of those are visual, just one is more effective (obviously a diagram is better).

His on-the-street test is also bad, someone with a different style will, for example, say the image name out loud, if they need it auditory.

[rg111]

What you say and the video says are not conflicting.

These are just personal preferences. There are no inherent style at the biological level. That's what "learning style" s are about.

I personally have found a combination of all (with more focus in applications and teaching the topic to others) works best for me.

> His on-the-street test is also bad

Agree. It was amusing in a bad way.