[ryanklee]

It does sound professional, to be honest. His tone is measured, he explains his position, gives reasons for his choices, and offers a plausible timeline.

This particular piece of evidence is not conclusive, but neither is it in your favor.

[bezier-curve]

> neither is it in your favor.

That doesn't matter though. The fact he is retaliating in public over a post that only references public information, using private information, is inherently bad faith acting. The context is what makes it unprofessional.

[ad404b8a372f2b9]

Your posts are deleted so there is no way to judge what you said and what response it called for. If a former member starts an AMA to badmouth a project, I'd expect the lead to respond and give the necessary information to defend the project and himself.

[historia_novae]

It's indeed pretty scummy to dox you in what was a pseudonymous post.

Also other posts in this thread seems like victim blaming. Just because someone is famous doesn't make him a good person.

[darkteflon]

You have the burden of proof exactly backwards.