Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by corrral 1482 days ago
- Some Linux users aren't fans of super-projects.

- Some Linux users really like modularity and composability ("do one thing") to the point of considering it a core tenet of unix-alikes overall.

- Systemd is perceived as being a super-project that is not practically modular and composable (though it may hypothetically be so)

- Some see systemd and related activity in Gnome and elsewhere as Red Hat bullying their way into excessive control over the direction of Linux.

- Mistrust of Poettering and the general attitude and competence of developers on the project—some of this hostility dates back to pulse audio, another Poettering/Red-Hat project that was seen by many as technically deficient, led by people with excessive hubris without the know-how or taste to back it up, and excessively/unjustifiably promoted by Red Hat and Poettering through political maneuvering.

- Concern that due to all of the above it represents: a power-grab by a single actor over Linux; a risk to Linux security and stability; and a risk to the future maintainability of, and practical transparency to the user of, Linux due to the scope, complexity, and architecture of the project, coupled with its heavy dependence on a single benefactor.

2 comments

> - Some Linux users aren't fans of super-projects. > - Some Linux users really like like modularity and composability ("do one thing") to the point of considering it a core tenet of unix-alikes overall.

That’s why Linux itself is a micro kernel. Oh wait… ;)

I'm not claiming these preferences are consistently applied, necessarily :-)
> - Some see systemd and related activity in Gnome and elsewhere as Red Hat bullying their way into excessive control over the direction of Linux.

The funny thing is that Redhat management didn't see the point until other distributions (read: Arch) adopted systemd. Until then, it was skunkworks.

Systemd was the default in Fedora before Arch had it in their repository.