[satao]

You can still do a webpage just like you did 20 years ago, inserting a couple HTML tags in a notepad.

Now the scope of what a webpage is capable of is infinitaly larger, and so is the complexity required for using all the new possibilities. If you want to use advanced stuff without learning the basics, than of course you're going to have a bad time.

[corrral]

3rd party JS code used to be snippets you were expected to copy-paste into your own code, or whole files you were expected to save and then load with a <script> tag before your own code.

Now there are like 50 ways to import JS code, most of them don't work most places, a lot of the code itself won't work in a browser at all (node-only), and a great deal of it is a pain to get into a browser if you're not fully bought into Node and probably also serving the whole "app" from Node.

It's about as easy to write your own JS in a browser, now, but it's vastly harder to start using code from the overall JS ecosystem.

[ratww]

> You can still do a webpage just like you did 20 years ago, inserting a couple HTML tags in a notepad.

Yes, I agree. That's exactly what I said in several parts of my message. However I believe you missed the point and didn't notice the sarcastic tone.

[igouy]

Perhaps expecting readers of a message board to pick-up on your sarcastic tone is not going to be an effective way to communicate your point.

[ratww]

I believe I did fine conveying it. The last paragraph makes it pretty clear I know there are other solutions. The problem with the reply wan't the sarcasm, but not reading the whole message.