|
|
|
|
|
by Pelam
1482 days ago
|
|
Some of this is valid concerns, but a strong vibe of ”anti democracy” in there too. Government is a direct extension of interests and will of the people (at least it should be.) In this vein the EU privacy regulations at least reflect an opposing force to the worst concerns mentioned. If collective regulation by elected officials is used to drive down society’s resource consumption or protect public health and it is implemented fairly and not invading _too much_ on other primary concerns (like privacy and protection from unfair litigation) I’m not sure we should be so alarmed about stuff like this (compared to Mad Max / Water World future threatening our children at least.) |
|
This is blatantly false, and calling the opinion to limit the power of government "anti democracy" is pure authoritarian Orwellian doublespeak.
> Government is a direct extension of interests and will of the people (at least it should be.)
This is definitely false in America.
The American government hasn't been a "direct extension of interests and will of the people" in multiple decades, if not half a century, and won't be until the regulatory capture, rampant monopolies, anticompetitive behavior, two-party system, bribery disguised as lobbying, and disproportionate representation of special interest groups all end.
Until then, limiting the power of government is the only sane course of action.