|
|
|
|
|
|
by afr0ck
1484 days ago
|
|
|
Let people say and express whatever they want. Why do you want to censor anything that you "hate" or anything that looks "ideological" to you? I don't see anything wrong with someone supporting BLM or mentioning a verse from the Quran or from the Bible on a technical website. For me, it would be an interesting short read/observation, I don't care if I don't agree, it doesn't matter. If I read a scientific paper from a Chinese researcher that mentions "Glory to the CCP", it would probably give me a short laugh, then I'll just move and focus on my goal (the science). |
|
|
Does this extend to letting people control other people and harass them with politics in their workplace to coerce them into expressing their politics ?
>Why do you want to censor
Quote 1 part of my comments where I advocated for censorship.
>anything that looks "ideological" to you
Is this meant to imply that "ideological" is subjective? Because I'm pretty sure all the examples I mentioned would all be recognized as partisan Ideology to the vast majority of people (except possibly the believers of said ideology, who would predictably disagree that it's anything but the plain obvious truth).
As for why I mock people who bring their ideology or religion to their workplace and why I think they are immature and unworthy of respect or cooperation, it's because I believe in not burning bridges.
Humans differ on uncountable millions of things, the exception is when we agree for once. A workplace is already full of potential and actual work-related conflicts enough, without somebody bringing in another certified-infinite source of conflicts that serves nothing except heat generation.
It's selfish and disgusting, like an army breaking a peace agreement to score a quick victory.