|
|
|
|
|
|
by fps_doug
1488 days ago
|
|
|
> I don't know if you're confusing me for somebody else, but I didn't link to any tweets. sigh.. Correction: the link to the tweet form the guy you replied to that you seemed to refer to. > And as I've now said twice, which has been ignored twice, the thread alludes to numerous unmade arguments about the reliability of the BBC, the UN, Le Monde, and a reporter as background to motivate the inference that their reporting is unreliable. I clicked the link again. I don't see any of that. It starts with claims about 1) a cursor (which I ignored) and 2) the issue with the characters, which is further elaborated on in a couple follow-up tweets. Then your comment mentions all these news outlets and I don't understand how that connects to the claims about the characters, or makes them taken out of context. It looks like a pretty stand-alone claim/issue that should be something to quickly do research on if you care about the topic, nothing taken wildly out of context. > I can repeat this all again and hope the fourth time is the charm? Sure, if that makes you feel better. |
|
|