|
|
|
|
|
by dtech
1488 days ago
|
|
It's semantically similar but not syntactic sugar, since it is not translated to Optional or wrapper types, so it also doesn't incur the overhead of Optional. I actually like the language support more, as it flows a lot better than the (flat)map chain you get in monadic style. Similar to async/await v.s. Future. |
|