|
|
|
|
|
by LegitShady
1485 days ago
|
|
> in service of the public good. being in service of the public good is not offering a service. Their job is to regulate industry, not offer it a service. If you want a service you hire someone to fulfill it. The US government created the 'service' but not for industry, but for the regulation of industry. The 'service' isn't offered to industry for the good of industry. It's the opposite of a normal understanding of service. If you are regulated have no choice whether to take the service or not, and your say in their 'services' is extremely limited. Calling it a service is an activity in intentionally misleading what an organization like the NCR does. They are not a service. They are a regulator. You are intentionally conflating two disparate definitions of service ('they offer a service' vs 'they are in the service of') and really for no gain except to come up with your own mandate for an NCR that already has one, and doesn't care about your opinion because they receive their mandate from government and not from you and your intentionally misleading arguments. |
|
Regulation doesn't means only hindering the industry, but accompanying its development safely through overseeing.