|
|
|
|
|
by tsuujin
1489 days ago
|
|
We basically adopted the MINASWAN interview, which Jesse Spevack can explain much better than myself in his talk [here](https://youtube.com/watch?v=c4K-ORZmrGk&feature=share). The overview is that for each candidate we spend 20 minutes reading through code we provide to them to demonstrate comprehension, and then we give them 45 minutes to pair with us on reimplementing that same code from scratch. What that code is doesn’t really matter, it’s more about getting a chance to work with them and start a conversation, and starting with trying to explain a provided example really smooths the way into the pair programming. |
|
Do you require pairing on real work? How do you handle candidates who need quiet to think? Going by the continual complaints about open plan offices, there seem to be a lot of us.