|
|
|
|
|
by zmgsabst
1488 days ago
|
|
From the US constitution: > The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable … seizures, shall not be violated, … but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the … things to be seized. From the article: > In a response to an interrogatory filed in the Kozbials' subsequent lawsuit against Highland Park, a city police officer answered "none" when asked to identify any predicate felony offenses justifying the seizure. What was the probable cause supported by oath or affirmation? |
|