Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by zmgsabst 1488 days ago
From the US constitution:

> The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable … seizures, shall not be violated, … but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the … things to be seized.

From the article:

> In a response to an interrogatory filed in the Kozbials' subsequent lawsuit against Highland Park, a city police officer answered "none" when asked to identify any predicate felony offenses justifying the seizure.

What was the probable cause supported by oath or affirmation?