[linkdd]

Thank you for the feedback as well :)

> I'm better than most reading poorer copy but I consider your(unchanged) copy very good.

This is nice to hear/read, yet I'm a perfectionist who knows perfection do not exist. The pitch can always be improved and clarity/transparency is very important to us.

> Unfortunately without the words"audit", "WORM" and"incident search" present or prominent I'm not your market.

This proves my previous point, since we rely on Docker images to implement the monitoring/reactivity part, literally ANY workflow/business logic can be applied (but we've been told that it's hard to trust "it can do everything").

> But I could think of many thousands of publication sites longing for your tool, if those terms applied.

I'd love to get in touch with you about that, if you have time, you can find my contact info in my profile: https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=linkdd