[Dylan16807]

It's a bend of the scenario if the judge is skimming and not paying close attention. This "pushes the limit".

It's a break of the scenario if they didn't go in with the goal of detecting fakery. This makes it useless as a "Turing test".

[jascii]

I agree with you that it brings things outside the original scope of the Turing test. I do find it interesting to observe that a metric based on casual observation can have value in a society where elections can be swayed by online fakery.