There are a lot of SEO-spam sites that look a lot like this one that are designed to top the results for searches like "technology 1 vs technology 2". They are all completely useless.
IMO If you really want to provide value, you have to dig into the actual details of these technologies, not just offer a top-level blurb and category label.
Just look at any Show HN post comments, engineers crave the details when it comes to comparing and choosing technologies.
Example: One thing I have always desired is somewhere to see all the major databases/event stream/persistence technologies and see what kinds of different consistency guarantees, replication, backup, recovery, etc. they each offer.
This goes a bit deep (most datastores have a bunch of different ways to configure and tune them for different consistency levels [1]) and is obviously more effort than the low-effort "this vs that" sites, but I don't see much value in the existing "this vs that" offerings.
IMO If you really want to provide value, you have to dig into the actual details of these technologies, not just offer a top-level blurb and category label.
Just look at any Show HN post comments, engineers crave the details when it comes to comparing and choosing technologies.
Example: One thing I have always desired is somewhere to see all the major databases/event stream/persistence technologies and see what kinds of different consistency guarantees, replication, backup, recovery, etc. they each offer.
This goes a bit deep (most datastores have a bunch of different ways to configure and tune them for different consistency levels [1]) and is obviously more effort than the low-effort "this vs that" sites, but I don't see much value in the existing "this vs that" offerings.
[1] https://docs.redis.com/latest/rs/concepts/high-availability/...