[lupire]

And they gave that number out before they assessed candidate level. But maybe that was recruiting BS as the pay for the max plausible level.

[jen20]

Usually positions are based on reqs rather than who walks through the door. The req will have a level attached, the level will have a salary band attached. I don’t understand what you’re trying to say here.

[bombcar]

It also lets the candidates talk about it even if they aren’t extended an offer - someone they mention it to might be the candidate the company is looking for.

[Infinitesimus]

380 isn't even close to the max possible level. If this was an Engineering role, that a mid level salary.

Your past experience can be a proxy for the role and level you're targeted for and thus, the comp target.

[PenguinCoder]

Mid-level salary where? That is an insane salary _anywhere_, no wonder the market is beginning to correct for those inflated "mid level" numbers.

[WaxProlix]

Mid level in SF, Seattle, and the bay, at any tier 1 paying company. You also have places like Amazon and MS up here in the Seattle area who target more like the 70th percentile for pay, where as an L6 senior SWE new offers are still topping 500k/yr.

The market is hot, and might be in a bubble, but these are comp numbers that you could have seen even five or six years ago at the FB, Snap, Lyft, even Googles of the world.

[htormey]

Well yeah, that’s what they think the candidates pay level will be. If the candidate doesn’t perform well in the interview they won’t get that offer.