|
|
|
|
|
|
by glenngillen
1497 days ago
|
|
|
This makes no sense. Heroku have had no competition because nobody has built a better product. They’ve not been starving anyone or anything. Given the biggest and most common complaint most lay against Heroku is that it’s too expensive, if anything the lack of innovation for years has created a huge window for a competitor. And yet here we are. Still. |
|
|
It's not unlike Google Search. Google Search has atrophied over the years but because it's still the best in the market, it's used by almost everyone. Competition is hard to build because it has to be better than Google Search in order to bother using it.
Heroku competitors have struggled in part because Heroku is a fully featured platform. It's relatively easy to build a platform that ticks a couple of boxes really well but building something that matches Heroku in feature parity is a daunting task. In order for competition to get there they need customers and funding, and funding is way easier to get the more customers come in through the door.
Once Heroku dies (perhaps already since this incident) we'll start to see real competition in this space because their competition will be getting used. The PaaS space needs that oxygen Heroku is taking up.