[ramy_d]

I feel like his solution is to let others decide what is or is not a "legitimate use" of a hyperlink. The Supreme Court decision is correct in that it protects all "free speech" on the internet. The takeaway here is that we, as a people with rights to free speech, have those rights protected in new media. It's not about how the underbelly of society can abuse those rights.

Tor also serves a particular goal that exposes itself to abuse, but should the project start discriminating on what content to allow based on that fact?