Yeah. For a community that constantly berates major tech companies for FPs in policy enforcement, it is baffling to see people say that various users are just obviously spam.
False positives are expected. It's another cost to handle them gracefully so that the people you affect are affected in the least bad way, and can get back up and running quickly.
I would expect this post to not go over well on another thread about an incorrect policy action. It is definitely not the norm that this community expects false positives.
Right? If there’s one thing we should know in this industry is that unless we have all the facts , we know nothing , and even when we do, we still know nothing.