|
|
|
|
|
|
by nickjj
1501 days ago
|
|
|
It's not the $2/mo at face value. For me it's the idea of them pushing to make paying for SSL certificates the norm again after Let's Encrypt has put in a huge amount of effort to change that field. Not that there's anything wrong with charging for things but charging for a free service rubs me in a weird way, especially since they're using Let's Encrypt. Using the rounding error logic, how do you feel about companies adding $1.99 "convenience fees" or "administrative fees"? |
|
|