Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by 2OEH8eoCRo0 1496 days ago
I still blame Google or big tech for this. If everybody were more open users wouldn't need to resort to shady shit.

They use shady hackers as an excuse to build their walled gardens which creates more shady hackers.

1 comments

It would be good if it was just that. This is an industry wide problem. Here are some examples that come to mind:

https://www.rust-lang.org/tools/install

The official install instructions for rust are to copy-paste and execute some script which then downloads code from the internet and executes it.

https://www.spotify.com/us/download/linux/

The official install instructions for Spotify are to copy-paste and execute some script which then downloads stuff and then use the downloaded file inside a comand executed as a super user. Same for VS Code:

https://code.visualstudio.com/docs/setup/linux

I am sure I can find many more such examples.

The classical Windows flow of download a random executable installer from the internet, it is automatically scanned by an antivirus, execute it, get a notification about its signature, and only afterwards maybe get a request for admin rights, is superior to sudo-wget:

https://tserong.github.io/sudo-wget/

People WILL download and execute shit from the internet. It is better to provide warnings where risk is involved instead of normalizing the riskiest path. sudo-wget is like unprotected sex during a one night stand.