|
|
|
|
|
by abxytg
1492 days ago
|
|
"Something which doesn't break the trust Anker of a Blockchain by having any dependency outside of a Blockchain." Only the critics look for this type of weird ideological purity. the rest of us just want somewhere to use the value we create. |
|
So you try to use this tech for tech sake?
Independent if there is already an existing solution?
A project is trying to add Blockchain technology into a project I'm working with. Just that the Blockchain is owned by some company and that company was publicly asking people I don't know if they are able and motivated to operate a node for them.
This for example sounds way more complex than just creating a company which has the purpose of being the trust Anker, implemented with technology like CA, contracts etc.