|
|
|
|
|
by wcrichton
1506 days ago
|
|
Thanks! Currently, I have no plans to convince users of Nota's longevity. It is a research prototype, and I will pursue it as long as I have the time and still think it's a good idea. My hope is that in the near-term, I (or other early-adopters) will create a gallery of documents that use Nota's features to convey information in a compelling way. Those examples will convince more people to adopt Nota for their blog or website. Maybe a forward-looking academic workshop convinces its authors to write their papers in Nota. And eventually some Nota will gather some institutional momentum to fund its development. Once there are enough Nota documents worth archiving, then people/orgs will invest resources into archival stability. So right now, I'm more interested in convincing people that using Nota can enable them to write documents that are significantly better for readers without significantly more effort on behalf of the authors. |
|
Re documents that would be useful, you could dogfood Nota with 242 to show how powerful it could be to teach students PL theory. A course like 15-312 would be much less intimidating for students if materials were encoded both informally/formally in Nota. You could imagine porting one chapter from PFPL as a small example.
I'm teaching a new course on algorithms in the spring and I plan to try it out to develop some online course materials. Will get in touch with you with any questions / to share what we prototype. You might also want to share this with Umut who has been developing (what I believe is) a KaTeX-based system called Diderot that a lot of CMU courses are using now.