|
|
|
|
|
by duxup
1498 days ago
|
|
I don't think regulatory capture is the issue here. We're talking about a disclosure of risks ... that seems reasonable to me. Dude says there is no risk of bankruptcy and is predicting court case outcomes... and it is clearly in his financial interest to make the arguments he is making. The system is rigged and other truthy arguments are all but standard operating procedure for whatever crytpo idea someone comes up with. Those arguments doesn't make mean we shouldn't be skeptical. |
|
> The system is rigged and other truthy arguments are all but standard operating procedure for whatever crytpo idea someone comes up with.
But remember that applies to both sides of the coin - the SEC disclosure of risks claiming there's a huge risk of monetary loss _is_ true, but it's also unavoidable as (to my understanding) there isn't currently a way for coinbase to be FDIC insured.
> Those arguments doesn't make mean we shouldn't be skeptical.
You should be incredibly skeptical, but you should be informed of what you're skeptical about.