Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by yucky 1494 days ago
>You see the word future there, don’t you? It’s right there.

Ah yes, the wording used to permanently deprive Constitutional rights because "I said so". That seems legit to you?

>And since terrorist qualify as combatants…voila!

This then applies to Antifa, Proud Boys, BLM, Communists & Qtards too, just as the founders intended. How convenient.

>You have absolutely no understanding of application of case. You don’t seem to be able differentiate between powers of governance and war powers.

YEs you have said clearly that the Constitution is literally irrelevant if the government wants you dead. And you think that sounds correct.

>Such killings have occurred in contexts as varied as the Civil War and the Cold War, based on powers vested in Article II of the Constitution

Name another US citizen put on a "Kill List", and denied Due Process while begging to be charged for 18 months with a crime. You can't, because it's never happened before.

Now about that question you absolutely refuse to answer, let's try it again shall we? Give me a legitimate reason why the government wouldn't charge him with a crime. They talked to the family countless times over that 18 months and received repeated assurance he would turn himself in as soon as he was charged, since it would guarantee his safety. So why didn't the government charge him?

1 comments

I can see your reading comprehension and capacity to process simple case, that has been re-explained to you numerous time, is simply not up to the task.

Have a nice day.

Now about that question you absolutely refuse to answer, let's try it again shall we? Give me a legitimate reason why the government wouldn't charge him with a crime. They talked to the family countless times over that 18 months and received repeated assurance he would turn himself in as soon as he was charged, since it would guarantee his safety. So why didn't the government charge him?