[fastball]

I know that's not what it means, which is why I was confused when you initially responded with the comment that you did. I guess partly I was confused by the condescending phrasing you used when nothing I said was incorrect. Any who.

My point was only – why would fly.io pay an appreciable sum to transfer the copyright of code already written when a FOSS license has already been applied to that code? Clearly that was a connection I was making in my head that I failed to write down in my comment.

[apgwoz]

I guess, fundamentally, the question comes down to: “will we expect lightstream to be developed under the name Ben Johnson, or Fly.io.” This _might_ have implications for what the project becomes.

My intention was not to be condescending, fwiw, so I am sorry for my failure there.