|
|
|
|
|
by Traster
1495 days ago
|
|
Ok, so fundamentally it's heavily discounting the collateral. I guess that makes it safer, but doesn't that mean you need way more collateral to support it and therefore you're paying a really high cost of capital? I can support $1Bn of stablecoin if I have $1Bn of USD in reserve, but to support $1Bn of stablecoin in this case I'd need $6.7Bn of BTC in reserve. Sounds expensive surely? |
|
If the BTC price collapses the people who bought your leveraged coin get wiped out, and effectively pay off the bottom guys.
This is why leveraged Bitcoin pawn-style loans are all over the place.