[mfester]

Yes, this is an interesting topic. In Motif, we are using MDX for the page content, which has an associated AST and a nice set of tools (Unified.js [1]) to manipulate it. We plan to use this to track semantic changes in the content, and act in an appropriate way. For instance, if the same block of JS code is changed, instead of merging, we can prompt the user with a diff and allow them to edit the final version manually (effectively transitioning from a synchronous to an asynchronous workflow). In simpler scenarios, such as text markup, we can use heuristics like the ones presented in Peritext [2].

[1] https://unifiedjs.com/ [2] https://www.inkandswitch.com/peritext/

[superlopuh]

Definitely seems like an asynchronous workflow, kind of like with git, is the way. I wonder whether something like this for markdown could be doable, with a GUI being able to render not just the markdown in either of the conflicting versions, but with an editing suggestion, like the ones in Google Docs. Not sure whether this would benefit from an extension of the MDX syntax, or could be handled by the runtime diff of the ASTs.

[lagrange77]

Hey, Motif looks really interesting, but i'm a bit confused.

Could you please explain how Motif touches the concepts of 'SSG', 'CMS', 'IDE'?

[mfester]

Sure! Motif is an MDX editor running in the browser, with a full-fledged JS build system inside (based on esbuild). It allows you to publish your content instantly (in fact, as a Next.js app, deployed on Vercel, benefitting from things like ISR to make your pages fast, SEO-ready, etc.). For instance, the entire Motif website is built on Motif, including the blog, as well as our docs: https://motif.land/docs.

[lagrange77]

Cool, thanks!