[gorgoiler]

I’ve always thought that voting, at the national level, might benefit from non-geographic constituencies.

The representatives might be for 24 to 34 year olds, unmarried mothers, children, prisoners, or of course the homeless. People who need more representation than they are probably getting.

The more categories you fall into, the more votes you get. Maybe that’s not a bad thing when faced with the status quo of money based politics.

It is a poorly thought out idea but your comment reminded me to give it some more time.

[yencabulator]

> I’ve always thought that voting, at the national level, might benefit from non-geographic constituencies.

The US voting system is uniquely bizarre and designed for vote manipulation by electoral district boundary fiddling. National level voting should just be by popular vote, like it is pretty much everywhere else.