[super_flanker]

I'm sure there would still be ways to bring the entire process to halt(for example, spawn thousands of threads with infinite loop). My point is just because a bad developer wrote bad code doesn't mean that a tradeoff chosen for a language design is necessarily bad.

[native_samples]

In reality it's very hard to accidentally write an infinite loop that spawns threads. There's no idiom that would lead to such a pattern and I can't recall ever encountering such a bug in the wild.

Yes, in theory, there are all sorts of ways you can still trash the process with bad code. But in practice, the sorts of bugs that programmers really make in GC-d memory-safe languages are the ones that don't. So, exception based error handling really does come in very useful and Rust probably got it wrong here.

[super_flanker]

We have to agree to disagree, both design decision have their tradeoffs.