| yes, but feudalism didn't exist before it started in Europe. So we use the name of the original one. For example, what you call Chinese feudalism (Fēngjiàn) As a result, Chinese history from the Zhou dynasty (1046 BC–256 BC) to the beginning of the Qin dynasty has been termed a feudal period by many Chinese historians, *due to the custom of enfeoffment of land similar to that in Medieval Europe*. But scholars have suggested that fengjian otherwise lacks some of the fundamental aspects of feudalism. This system is often conflated with Confucianism but also with Legalism. The name was given post-facto, but it wasn't feudalism, it was Fēngjiàn. Techno-feudalism is simply feudalism fuelled by the control of technology instead of the land. We could call it thechno-fēngjiàn, if you prefer. But I also do not think that techno-feudalism is actually feudalism. Techno-aristocracy or techno-oligarchy are a better description IMO For once, Google doesn't need to pay and feed an army to dominate the ADV market or build castles surrounded by walls, they simply need to maintain their dominant position crushing or buying the competition and strike a deal with those they can't buy or crush. |
They don't need to _yet_ that is. I always found the imagery in _The Diamond Age_ of New Atlantis to be a fun steam punk take of a future in an alternative-history. However I can't help but think of it when I read about Amazon's "Helix" and 'Amazonia' in Seattle, or Apple's "Spaceship" complex, Google's ... etc.
Really, we just need a few more legal tenets of Manorism where workers can't leave their sanctioned tech estate, ahem https://knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu/article/silicon-valleys-...