| > I have no idea what you mean by that. A brief read about Jung's concept of synchronicity might clear that up. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Synchronicity https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pauli_effect > You say nature isn't "humanoid" and then ascribe to it qualities like ruthlessness. Definition of kind: "having or showing a friendly, generous, and considerate nature." One can argue that non-humanoid processes or things are kind without violating basic precepts. For instance, a crane machine at an arcade might be viewed as kind or forgiving if its claws don't drop items so easily. Or the machine might be viewed as ruthless if its claws drop items all the time. > You're just as biased and delusional as whoever you're criticizing. Fucking rude, dude. My post wasn't criticism - it was an explanation.. |