Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by rbehrends 1511 days ago
The actual waste here is that while the European Parliament normally meets in Brussels, it is still bound by a 1992 decision to have a monthly session in Strasbourg [1]. This creates a huge and unnecessary overhead (shuttling 705 MEPs back and forth, maintaining separate offices in Strasbourg and other unnecessary duplication of efforts), of which this additional flight is just a small part. This could be fixed by deciding that the European Parliament meets in Brussels year-round.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seat_of_the_European_Parliamen...

2 comments

Or just keep adding more capitals into the rotation, until the overhead of any capital is negligible. I'm actually rather happy to have a moving capital / parliament seat. Would probably do with the fancy buildings and architecture, though.
They do that for the European Council, but it's probably not feasible to do so for all seven EU "houses of Parliament".
> keep adding more capitals into the rotation, until the overhead of any capital is negligible

In what world is maintaining multiple headquarters cheaper than one?

The more capitals you have, the less you need to proportionately increase your budget to add another one.
This guy bureaucrats.
The French will never agree to that, sadly. It's a prestige thing for them