[nix23]

>In the ordinary cases, btrfs full behavior is the same as other filesystems.

Exactly that's NOT the case:

>>-Reboot and end up with unbootable /

You can test it for yourself, it "works" reliable since over more then 8 years.

[cmurf]

I just tried it like I mentioned in another comment in this thread and cannot reproduce it.

As much effort as you've spent complaining about this problem in this thread you could have provided a proper bug report in the proper venue. It's not going to get fixed by complaining on HN.

So I have to ask if you just want to complain about it or if you want it fixed? Both can be true and legit. But it still requires a report in the proper venue with enough detail for someone else to reproduce.

[nix23]

>As much effort as you've spent complaining about this problem in this thread you could have provided a proper bug report in the proper venue. It's not going to get fixed by complaining on HN.

You don't even tryed....a loop device really? And hey i use zfs, i don't trust btrfs who has problems (data-loss) since 10 year. No thanks....hell even SLES recommends for data partitions XFS.

>But it still requires a report in the proper venue with enough detail for someone else to reproduce.

Hey how about you? Since you seam to care..install a vm ~10minutes? fill it ~10minutes? there you go.