| > I still don't understand the objection. Please re-read what I wrote in my very first comment > What makes you say the .value and @click attributes are invalid? Just checked the spec, you're right they are valid. Hm, I was sure they weren't. Won't dig through the history to see if this changed :) However, "Authors must not use elements, attributes, or attribute values that are not permitted by this specification or other applicable specifications, as doing so makes it significantly harder for the language to be extended in the future.", https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/dom.html#elements So I'd say they are still not okay on existing HTML elements > It might be "invalid" according to a spec that makes no difference. That is a very bad stance to take. "Invalid to the spec, but who cares". > What is the rallying cry against Lit, exactly? There's no rallying cry against lit. Stop. Inventing. Words. And. Meanings. I. Never. Said. Or. Implied. There's a single very literal comment I made with links to support that statement. I'm out of this discussion. I have other things to do with my life than keep saying "I never said what you think I said" over, and over, and over again. |